Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr has drawn attention to reports suggesting that California officials had explored the possibility of withdrawing from an antitrust lawsuit against a proposed blockbuster media merger if it included spinning off CNN as an independent entity. The comments come amid a lawsuit by California and a group of other states to halt the transaction, which involves Paramount acquiring Warner Bros. Discovery in a deal valued at more than 100 billion dollars.
The joint lawsuit was filed earlier this week in federal court in California by Attorney General Rob Bonta along with attorneys general from more than a dozen other states. It argues that the combination would violate antitrust principles by concentrating too much power in the hands of the merged company when it comes to negotiating with movie theaters and cable distributors. According to the states, this increased leverage could lead to higher costs passed along to consumers, reduced competition in the entertainment sector, and ultimately less variety and quality in films and television programming available to the public.
The proposed acquisition would bring together major Hollywood studios, extensive content libraries, and various distribution platforms under one corporate umbrella led by David Ellison. Proponents of the deal have described it as a necessary step to compete in a rapidly evolving media landscape dominated by large technology platforms. Critics, however, see it as another step toward greater consolidation that could limit choices for audiences and squeeze smaller players in the industry.
Carr referenced earlier news accounts indicating that California had considered dropping its opposition to the merger if CNN were separated out as a standalone operation, according to The Hill. He questioned the underlying antitrust theory advanced by the states, observing that it appeared unusual for the strength of such a case to hinge so heavily on the status of a single cable news channel. In his view, this aspect of the reports raised questions about whether the litigation represented a fully developed antitrust concern or something more conditional in nature.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has taken a firm position against allowing the merger to move forward without thorough judicial review. When pressed during public remarks about the earlier reports of a possible CNN divestiture as a path to resolving state concerns, Bonta has denied that selling CNN would be enough to end its lawsuit.
The company behind the acquisition has pushed back strongly against the lawsuit, describing it as a distortion of established antitrust standards and a misrepresentation of current market conditions in entertainment. Officials there argue that the industry already features intense competition from numerous streaming services, traditional broadcasters, and independent producers. They have warned that delays caused by litigation would primarily benefit large technology companies while harming consumers and creative talent in Hollywood.
President Trump has publicly expressed support for the overall transaction, noting his interest in seeing CNN come under new ownership given his long-standing criticisms of the network. The political dimension adds another layer to what is already a complex regulatory and legal situation involving both state antitrust enforcement and potential federal oversight by the FCC on media ownership and related matters.
Beyond the immediate courtroom battle, the outcome could shape the future structure of the American media and entertainment industries. A successful block or significant restructuring might preserve more independent voices in news and content creation, while approval without major conditions could accelerate consolidation trends that have defined Hollywood for years. The states involved maintain that their action protects fair competition and ultimately serves the interests of moviegoers, cable subscribers, and viewers across the country who rely on diverse programming options.
The litigation remains in its early stages, with the states seeking to prevent the deal from closing until a full examination of its competitive impacts can occur. Industry observers are watching closely to see whether negotiations or further regulatory reviews might produce any adjustments to the transaction structure. For now, the focus stays on the courtroom, where arguments about market power, consumer prices, and the role of major news outlets like CNN will continue to unfold.
Please add Cord Cutters News as a source for your Google News feed HERE. You can watch today’s top cord cutting stories on our YouTube channel HERE. Please follow us on Facebook and X for more news, tips, and reviews. Need cord cutting tech support? Join our Cord Cutting Tech Support Facebook Group for help.
